A brief foreword to kick things off, travelling around Venice in my very brief experience is a combination of:
- Boating to terra firma, around the islands, and through the canals.
- Walking about sunlit squares (campos), through shaded (yet light strewn) alleyways, and across one of the unfathomable number of bridges.
My question is, why only Venice? Why does the rest of the world conform to the norm of this ridiculous idea that 'roads' are clearly, totally the way we should go. Noone can argue that roads aren't efficient, which surely is taken to it's logical conclusion in New York - a city with such an efficient road system that it doesn't even need road names any more (the corner of 31st St. and 5th Ave. doesn't so much use names as much as it does a grid location).
“Roads are devices that allow some people to dash from point A to point B very fast while other people dash from point B to point A very fast. People living at point C, being a point directly in between, are often given to wonder what's so great about point A that so many people from point B are so keen to get there, and what's so great about point B that so many people from point A are so keen to get there. They often wish that people would just once and for all work out where the hell they wanted to be.”
- Ever-so-slightly adapted from A Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams.
![]() |
| Walk forward. Go wherever the fuck you like, you'll enjoy it. |
But is efficiency the sole reason for this normalcy of the construction of roads? I can assure you that income only makes you so happy and there are in fact a multitude of other pathways to that ever desirable position of being content. I, for one, much preferred the Venetian lifestyle in which I could jump on a vaporetto (waterbus) in the morning to buy a croissant and espresso; as opposed to the deathly boring monotony of trudging to a bus-stop to get on a U1 with 50 other people (conjuring up feelings of being sent a labour camp in the Easternmost reaches of Siberia) in order to grab a decidedly lacklustre sandwich from Costcutter. As far as I'm concerned if a city manages to make sitting at a bus-stop feel like a cultural and interesting experience they've done fucking fantastically.
| Bus Stops -- Best served with water. |
I'm sure Venice would be made a whole lot more 'efficient' if there were a road system and less of that pesky water yet I doubt even one Venetian would wish such a thing. I'm sure I would love boating to work every morning, sitting in a campo on my lunch break and sipping on a Spritz in the sun - who cares if the captain, the bartender and my boss are probably all in a persistent state of drunkenness? If I were them I would be doing exactly the same.
“For instance, on the planet Earth, American had always assumed that he was more intelligent than Venetian because he had achieved so much—the pretzel, New York, wars and so on—whilst all the Venetian had ever done was muck about in the water having a good time. But conversely, the Venetian had always believed that they were far more intelligent than American - for precisely the same reasons.”
- adapted from A Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams.
I'm not advocating flooding the world and ridding us of roads, I know that would be a logistical nightmare that frankly could only be achieved with the efficient marvels of a functioning road system. No, all I ask is that we consider alternatives, all I ask is that we don't just assume that efficiency leads to enjoyment.
Diversity. Diversity. Diversity
That is todays message. Imagine a tree-top city in which monkey-ropes and rickety wooden bridges were the means a travel; a city in which there were a legal minimum blood alcohol level because fuck it everyone should be more chilled out; a city in which all of your wildest dreams are realised - then build it, because I want to visit.
As a couple addendums :
- I actually love New York.
- I am a big fan of capitalism and apologise to it, as an abstract concept, for my slight faux pas in holding these beliefs.













